AMLO assured that he does not rule out the creation of a social network created by the government to stop the “censorship” and “control” that firms such as Facebook or Twitter have. The disagreement between the Russia Mobile Database president of Mexico , Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) and social networks such as Twitter or Facebook could rise to a new level.
For a long time, AMLO has shown his position around these spaces for social interaction, which although he recognizes are necessary in communication issues, he has also described them as vicious spaces where bots and false accounts have acted, according to Obrador, against of your image. The latest claim towards these services has been related to the alleged censorship of freedom of expression.
What was said by AMLO
After it became known that spaces such as Twitter and Facebook censored the account of the still president of the United States, Donald Trump, his Mexican counterpart decided to take a stand.
After what happened in Washington, AMLO assured that “something that I did not like yesterday about the Capitol affair, nothing but respect, I do not like censorship. I do not like that anyone is censored and takes away the right to transmit a message on Twitter or on Face, I do not agree with that, I do not accept that “, while detailing” imagine that Twitter as a company decides’ you do not, because what they are saying is harmful, damaging or damaging goes against the good customs of the police and good government side. (…) I punish you because I judge like the Holy Inquisition I consider that what you are saying is harmful ‘, where is the norm?
After these sayings issued last week, now AMLO has not missed the opportunity to return to the subject.
During the conference this morning, AMLO indicated that “how is it possible that a particular company is going to know everything that human beings do, our tastes, what we do in public and what we do in private, our family talks, the conversations with our friends ”, after having launched a new accusation of censorship in spices such as Facebook or Twitter.
A new social network of your own?
With these statements of context and before an express question, AMLO assured that he does not rule out the creation of a social network created by the government to stop the “censorship” and “control” that firms such as Facebook or Twitter have.
In a timely manner, a reporter present at the confirms questioned: “President, has a call been made from the federal government for creatives who design applications, who design platforms so that they can have their own in our country and have access to , in order to have alternatives? “
To this question, AMLO replied “surely Jorge Arganis (head of the SCT ) is taking note. We go on that road. We are not going to stop reflecting, analyzing all this that has to do with social networks, we care a lot, we care a lot about freedom. For this reason, it is an issue that will be dealt with by us and we do not rule out that Conacyt, as you propose, the Ministry of the Interior, the Legal Counsel, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs itself, all of them, Communications, looking for options, alternatives, I clarify, to guarantee freedom, for freedom and so that in Mexico there is no censorship, a country without censorship. Mexico, a country without censorship, a country of freedoms. So that is a commitment that we have ”.
The above is a clear example of how social networks have become an important muscle in the construction of democracy in the country.
Social networks such as Facebook and Twitter are the backbone of the current president’s communication efforts, which allegedly had a role beyond the dissemination of information on his way to the presidential seat.
For many specialists, in the same way that happened with Donald Trump or Barack Obama, the efforts within these communication spaces were decisive for AMLO’s victory in the most recent presidential elections.
The importance of social networks in the Brother Cell Phone List panorama of political communication would force strategists in the field to understand these channels as something more than a simple means of diffusion and amplification of a message.
The actions derived from what is published or not in spaces such as Twitter or Facebook have real and tangible impacts; Today they are translated into decisions and events that can modify the dynamics of various aspects of great importance for building a good government.