Even before her offer to “come all over and publish what you want,” Parler’s creators sued Amazon for shutting her off AWS. The case of the United States Capitol went around the world as a regrettable episode for the country and democracy in general, but also because of the power of social networks, after Venezuela Mobile Database it was determined that prior to the riots in Washington, there was a huge call from social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, by President Donald Trump and his followers. Moreover, from platforms without regulation of messages that promote violence, such as Parler .
For example, a group of activists published a series of screenshots of Parler users who promoted violence on the social network with messages, calling on other users to physically attack federal administration officials, including Vice President Mike Pence.
While this Parler does not regulate the terms and conditions of service both the Store Play Google as its counterpart iOS Apple , and even AWS for Amazon , they can not allow this, so they decided veto the app .
According to Vox, the social network is characterized by investing almost nothing in content moderation efforts, as part of its value proposition. This has made it a place where radical and extremist voices can grow and develop an audience. It is even compared to forums like 4Chan, also infamous for its community.
However, even before his offer to “come all and publish what you want”, the creators of the social network sued Amazon for ending a web hosting agreement. About Apple and Google, he said that: “Amazon, Google and Apple have the power to destroy anyone.”
We recommend you:
5 precepts of Bill Gates on current effective leadership
Women’s leadership is in sharp decline, study finds
Samsung surprises with this robot ready for CES 2021
They say Amazon Web Services broke ties to prevent Parler from competing with Twitter, and is asking a court to prevent Amazon from closing his account, arguing that a prolonged shutdown would be like “disconnecting a patient from the hospital on life support.”
But Amazon already defends itself, citing dozens of posts inciting violence, 98 to be precise. It includes screenshots of a call to hang “traitors,” as well as an exhortation to “begin to systematically murder” liberal leaders, supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement, and others.
Amazon immediately publicly announced that it “cannot provide services to a customer who cannot effectively identify and remove content that encourages or incites violence against others.”
AWS is the world’s largest cloud service provider, controlling about a third of the market, followed by competitors like Brother Cell Phone List Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. Parler contends that being kicked out of AWS was a “death sentence” for the site, as it has been unable to find another host. And he claims Amazon made the call to protect Twitter, as the two companies signed a multi-year deal for web services last year.
And it is not the first time that an app that allows radicals to promote violence has sued a company for dissociating itself from it, Gab, another social network favored by far-right figures, sued Google in 2017 for removing it from the Play Store, claiming that it constituted anti-competitive behavior.
