It turned out that Trump’s profiles were visible again on Facebook and Instagram, he cannot actually post, the block continues. A topic worthy of debate came when the enormous power of social networks in the Latvia Mobile Database world became evident, not only in terms of entertainment, but in the election of a President. However, it was not possible to fully assess how much Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat or YouTube could do, until the President of the world power that represents the United States, Donald Trump , was able to veto himself in a second for his publications.
In addition to this, the case of Trump is peculiar, it also made evident the convening power of the platforms, when he gathered his followers near the Capitol on the day that Congress would ratify the victory of Joe Biden as the new President of the United States. .
Shortly after, his publications pointing to fraud and defending the sovereignty of the country, allegedly were the incentive for Protestant hordes to enter the Capitol and do damage. The balance was serious and worrying. Later, he published a video in which he asked “to go home in peace” after they broke in aggressively, but the fact involves several aspects worthy of analysis.
Bloquear a Trump
The first position is the responsibility of social platforms in all this, to avoid a massive call from their ranks, they came out to communicate their measures against the promotion of violence and quickly blocked the accounts of the President.
On Twitter , Trump incited that the elections are a fraud and to protest about it, which the social network is finally penalizing strongly. In a brief statement, Twitter indicated in turn that “future violations of the rules, including civic integrity policies and violent threats, will result in the permanent suspension” of the account of the outgoing president. That is what the platform aims at, that it be permanently eliminated.
soon joined YouTube and Snapchat . The first received an impulse from its collaborators asking that it take measures to respect it; meanwhile, the second already had experience implementing measures against Trump due to concerns about the president’s dangerous rhetoric. During June he announced that Trump’s Snapchat content would no longer be promoted on his Discover tab and would only be visible to users if they subscribed or searched.
We recommend you:
They create a calculator that reveals the date when you would have the vaccine
Soriana: you can now get tested for COVID-19 at the supermarket
So you can improve the way you look for a job on LinkedIn
Facebook: a special case
Facebook began by preventing the president from posting to the site for 24 hours from that night. Subsequently, both Facebook and Instagram vetoed the president on January 7, hours after the group of followers stormed the headquarters of Congress, in Washington, indefinitely, at least until the new President, Biden, takes the reins of the country.
More than 1.79 billion people use Facebook every day and it has 2.7 billion users every month.
“Therefore, we are extending the lockdown we have placed on their Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks, until the peaceful transition of power is complete,” said Mark Zuckerberg.
However , yesterday it emerged that Trump’s profiles were visible again on Facebook and Instagram and this lent itself to interpreting that they had been unblocked, but in reality Trump cannot publish from his profiles, the blocking continues.
The replication of the information of a possible return of the President on these social networks was so strong that Facebook had to clarify the situation and Andy Stone, Facebook’s Communication Manager , said in this regard that the information of an unlocking is false, although actually the notes referred to the visibility of the profiles.
In the end, the profiles can be viewed, but Trump cannot post.
“There have been no changes in the status of the president’s Facebook and Instagram accounts. That report is false. The indefinite block that we place on the president’s ability to post from those accounts remains in place and there are no plans to lift it, ”he explained.
The background theme
The surrounding debate is not limited to whether or not Trump should be blocked, whether social networks can influence as a space that promotes violence, freedom of expression, but all that together, they are so powerful that they can decide on the President’s account.
It is about a private company whose Brother Cell Phone List power can be used with different nuances, and those who live in countries with censorship and among powerful companies that have joined the State, find the issue especially worrying. As an example, we can cite the opinion of the activist Russian Alexei Navalny, who exposed the subject on Twitter, in a sense of denouncing it as “an unacceptable act of censorship”.