From YouTube they have indicated that a second warning to the channel would result in a suspension for two weeks, while with a third warning the veto would be permanent. After social networks became great allies for Switzerland Mobile Database Donald Trump during his campaign and much of his term, now days after he hands over the presidency, these platforms seem to turn their back on considering that his speech incites violence. The last to make this decision was YouTube.
The video platform owned by Google announced that it has suspended the account of the still president of the United States for at least a week after a video was filed in which, according to the social network, incited violence.
The material in question was published on Tuesday, as indicated by a YouTube spokesperson, violates the service’s policies on incitement to violence.
In this way, YouTube has explained that the suspension for at least seven days is a warning for the president’s channel, so now he will not be able to upload any material. After reviewing the channel’s activity, it has been indicated that the suspension could be extended.
Additionally, Google’s video service has disabled the ability to comment on the channel’s videos indefinitely.
“After careful review, and in light of concerns about potentially continuing violence , we have removed new content uploaded to Donald J. Trump’s channel and issued a warning for violating our anti-hate speech policies,” said a spokesperson. from YouTube to Business Insider while explaining that “as a result, and according to our well-known ad system, the channel will not be able to upload new videos or broadcast live for a minimum of seven days, a period that could be extended. We have also indefinitely disabled comments on the channel’s videos, actions similar to those we have taken on previous occasions for security reasons ”.
Es la última de una larga lista
At this point, it is important to mention that although the account is suspended, the channel is still active so that users can still access the videos published before the date on which the partial veto was launched.
Additionally, from YouTube they have indicated that a second warning to the channel would result in a suspension for two weeks, while with a third warning the veto would be permanent.
Although by many this decision was applauded, the truth is that for most it is a movement that came particularly late.
The criticism has come from within. The recently created Alphabet Workers Union has criticized YouTube for its “lackluster” and belated response to the events that occurred in days past on Capitol Hill.
Why did it take so long?
The question to answer is why YouTube and its counterparts took so long to make this decision.
While it is true that Trump’s divisive messages have intensified in recent weeks, the truth is that we speak of a condition that was constant throughout his term.
Despite the fact that warnings were issued on several occasions, the reality is that a real block to Trump’s activity on social networks never existed.
And it is that despite the criticism generated, the truth is that Trump remained a great business for many of these platforms.
Just acknowledge what happened to Twitter . At least that is what some analysts expected a little less than three years ago, when Trump’s campaign around fake news was a great boost for the social network.
At the time, Monness Crespi Hardt Brother Cell Phone List & Co analyst James Cakmak, in an interview with Bloomberg, indicated that Twitter would lose about $ 2 billion if Trump left the social network, which would cause a drop in the price of the actions; so it would be a sixth of the commercial value of the social network, which is estimated at 11.9 billion dollars.